Most other OSs I’ve tried while in beta were very much less buggy than Fedora, and they’ve been making more far reaching changes than have these Red Hat guys (DragonFly for example has been ripping the guts out of their kernel and putting it back together completely differently for MONTHS now, and their OS has been pretty solid despite that fact, the odd day aside). It’s not getting better nearly as fast as it should. I am sharing my pain here, hopefully enlightening people as to the twisted nature of this Fedora beast. It’s sickening how flawed this is, even for a test release. SELinux is the step stone to make this difference again, only this time difference would be much larger than beforeĪnd I have filed bug reports.
DEAD SPACE 2 ZEALOT SUIT SOFTWARE
With M$ anouncing userland based software security yesterday, (for user to be finally able to work without adminitrative privileges) and Firewall, M$ would step almost on the same height as Linux. I’m no Linux fan in general, but SELinux would be a great thing for those of you who are…įor the difference, I’m Linux fan in general, but I agree with you completely. …I can’t think of anyone who has done quite so much with it as Red Hat has to date. There’s just not enough time since they incorporated SELinux inside. The only thing that makes SELinux so worth of trouble are complex setups, and honestly I doubt that FC2 could have great SELinux implementation. fx: system root or root trough su command Trouble comes when policies are not relaxed and user depends on different steps. Writing relaxed policies is not so trivial (almost as easy as cliking Allow RWX Everyone). … The SELinux stuff still hasn’t been properly set up, but that’s not suprising as it’s going to be a really big job to do the first time around…